Kia Sportage Kia Niro: Diesel Hybrid SUV or, what is better?
After the appearance of the Kia Niro is inevitable -SUV and hybrid- think if I could be better than a modern turbodiesel as the Sportage What is it?
The Kia Niro has led to a rupture between the SUV Compact to be the first hybrid that democratizes technology, offering it a likeness of turbodiesel and a fully functioning comparable price wise driving sensations to a conventional automatic car. Hence, it has seemed to us very interesting to put his side a modern SUV to identify the strengths and weaknesses of each after determine whether turbodiesel are numbered or resist the pressure. To do this, nothing better than to compare it with another SUV Kia Sportage, launched in the 2016, whose basic engine directly compete with the Kia Niro.
So we have on one hand the Kia Sportage, a SUV compact 4.48 m long, front wheel drive, with a reliable 1.7 CRDi turbodiesel engine and six-speed manual transmission, representing the mainstream, and secondly to novel Kia Niro. This is somewhat shorter, has a gasoline engine of 1.6 l Miller and operating cycle, which can operate together or alternatively and looks supported by a small electric motor. It is also front-wheel drive, but in this case is associated with a DCT double-clutch six-speed. Presented both enter on.
Kia Niro vs Kia Sportage: performance
The theoretical advantage in power Kia Niro about him Kia Sportage (141 hp versus 116) coupled to it is practically 100 kg lighter results in eminent domain in performance by the Kia Niro. It’s not only faster in pure acceleration, a next lead after 2 seconds to travel 1,000 meters departing from standing, but its automatic transmission makes it easier to overtake because it lowers few marches necessary until engine gasoline reaches its maximum power zone. If we add more running into something less braking distance and brakes have more resistance to fatigue, it seems clear that the Kia Niro has advantage in dynamic capacity it is however much medium and high speeds noisier.
BENEFITS | Kia Niro | Kia Sportage |
Acel. 0-100 km / h | 10.25 s | 11.27 s |
Acel. 0-400 meters | 17.31 s | 17.82 S |
Acel. 0-1000 meters | 31.91 | 33.86 s |
Overtaking 80-120 km / h | 7.41 s in D | 9.31 s in 4th |
Loudness 100 km / h | 69.6 dB | 65.7 dBA |
Loudness 120 km / h | 71.5 dB | 68.4 dBA |
Braking from 140 km / h | 71.0 m | 71.7 m |
Weight scale | 1,478 kg | 1,591 kg |
Kia Niro vs Kia Sportage: consumption
He consumption, mainly urban, it is traditionally one of the strengths of hybrids since grubbed occur prioritizing the use of the electric motor. Hence, it is not surprising that the Kia Niro spend much less fuel, more than three l / 100 km apart, in town the Kia Sportage 1.7 CRDI. It is true that road the difference between the two is reduced, but in any case the differences are still notable, with almost 1 l / 100 km less in favor of Kia Niro. So, this hybrid has an advantage at all to what criteria affect usage costs.
CONSUMPTION | Kia Niro | Kia Sportage |
Consumption city | 3.93 l / 100 km | 7.12 l / 100 km |
Consumption Highway | 4.82 l / 100 km | 5.72 l / 100 km |
average consumption | 4.46 l / 100 km | 6.28 l / 100 km |
Kia Niro vs Kia Sportage: space
Three centimeters extra legroom rear passengers and 125 liters of capacity in the trunk, under the sunblind, on behalf of Kia Sportage summarizes the differences that separate it from Niro. Because, despite its smaller size, it has a favorable ratio for space for -exagerada head in this case by the presence of the sunroof in the Sportage- as 2 cm difference in the width of the front seats not significant. In front there is always room for two people.
SPACE | Kia Niro | Kia Sportage |
front width | 143 cm | 145 cm |
rear width | 137 cm | 137 cm |
front height | 95-101 cm | 89-95 cm |
rear height | 98 cm | 94 cm |
Legroom | 73 cm | 76 cm |
Trunk | 415 liters | 540 liters |
Kia Sportage and Kia Niro: its official price
The old advertising slogan “Diesel fuel price” is disavowed in this confrontation. It turns out that hybrid, with gasoline engine and electric, it clearly more advantageous than the Diesel by comparing their rates. It is a difference that is growing as we add equipment and, excluding promotional discounts reached just over 2,000 euros. The more popular priori, intermediate finishing Drive, stood at 1,500 in favor of Niro. This circumstance makes us think that Kia has invested heavily to make hybrid natural I can therefore replace the more complicated to manufacture turbodiesel.
Price without discounts, September 2016 | Kia Niro | Kia Sportage 1.7 CRDI |
Concept | 25,400 euros | 25,750 euros |
Drive | 26,800 euros | 28,350 euros |
Emotion | 29,800 euros | 31,950 euros |
Kia Niro vs Kia Sportage: Official data sheets
Data sheet | Kia Niro | Kia Sportage |
Motor | 4 cylinders in line + power | 4 cylinders in line |
displacement | 1,580 cm3 | 1,685 cm3 |
Maximum power | 141 hp 5,700 rpm | 116 hp at 4,000 rpm |
maximum torque | 27.0 mkg of 1000-2400 rpm | 28.6 mkg of 1250-2750 rpm |
Transmission | Lead | Lead |
Change | Automatic DCT dual-clutch six relations | Manual six relations |
Length x WIDTH X HEIGHT | 4.36 x 1.54 m x1,81 | 4.48 x 1.86 x 1.64 m |
Battle and routes | 2.70 x 1,56-1,57m | 2.67 x 1.61 to 1.63 m |
officer Porter | 401 liters | 503 liters |
Acceleration from 0 to 100 km / h | 11,5 s | 11,5 s |
Maximum speed | 162 km / h | 176 km / h |
You may also like
Kia Niro: actual consumption and impressions
Kia Sportage 1.7 CRDi 4×2 test
actual consumption of cars: models less spending by category