BMW 130i versus VW Golf R32

The steering wheel has a sporty air in this BMW 130i.The shifter has one of the few logos130i seats provide outstanding grip sporty driving.The rear seats are smaller than the compact Volkswagen.
BMW 130i versus VW Golf R32BMW 130i versus VW Golf R32
Watch videosWatch video
BMW 130i versus VW Golf R32
BMW 130i versus VW Golf R32
  • BMW 130i
BMW 130i versus VW Golf R32
BMW 130i versus VW Golf R32BMW 130i versus VW Golf R32

BMW 130i versus VW Golf R32BMW 130i versus VW Golf R32
Watch videosWatch video
BMW 130i versus VW Golf R32
BMW 130i versus VW Golf R32
  • VW Golf R32
BMW 130i versus VW Golf R32
BMW 130i versus VW Golf R32BMW 130i versus VW Golf R32

BMW 130i versus VW Golf R32BMW 130i versus VW Golf R32
Watch videosWatch video
BMW 130i versus VW Golf R32
BMW 130i versus VW Golf R32
  • R32 vs. 130i
BMW 130i versus VW Golf R32
BMW 130i versus VW Golf R32BMW 130i versus VW Golf R32
Over 250 hp, just over four meters and promise to go very fast. These characteristics are valid for two cars of our comparative, but the differences between them are so great that try to simplify their nature in one sentence seems a strategy to failure mission.And the mere configuration of each vehicle is different. The Golf uses 4Motion all-wheel drive, which is already known in the range, and in this version is true justification -in other models is recommended, the R32 is compulsorily. This element, in addition to the plus security conferred on asphalts in poor condition or under adverse weather conditions, will come in handy the most powerful Golf, because it "subject" to the ground when we decided to put all the meat on the grill and extract everything you can offer us this R32. As much as we tread the throttle, both straight and support, stability is not compromised and no loss of traction occur, which might seem logical given the enormous number of horses of this compact.He BMW 130i uses a different configuration and It opts for rear wheel drive, common in the Bavarian brand. With it, ensures the most exciting performance and quality unattainable guided in the category. However, there are many horses behind, which determines their behavior and makes it delicate in certain situations: wet asphalt or bad weather. For the moment, when the back-and insinuates sometimes more than that- and adrenaline shooting, you have to have good hands on the wheel. Definitely, 130i is the best choice for drivers who want sepan- -and bring out the full potential of the vehicle.Both models present us with firm, but not uncomfortable, and with accurate directions suspensions and snapshots, but in this section, we opted for the compact BMW, because the sensations offered are better: their suspensions are more effective and provide more comfort to the occupants and radiography wheel best asphalt and is faster in driving dynamics. Of course, when maneuvering the car is stationary or at low speed, we felt something hard.Both BMW and Volkswagen are cars that run a lot. Their engines they promise, but, as in the case of traction differs both mechanical configuration, The propeller 130i is a six-cylinder 265 hp officially delivered and a maximum torque of 32.7 mkg (269.1 hp and 33.3 mkg on our dynamometer); While, R32 is "satisfied" with "only" 250 hp and torque of 32.7 mkg (258 hp and 35 mkg, according to our measurements) and with a mechanical arrangement also comprising six cylinders, although in estes case V

brakes both are a guarantee of successboast a captivating sound

Averages around 11 liters per 100 km in the combined cycle, as measured by our Technical Center, seem to us a "price" worth paying
BMW 130i versus VW Golf R32BMW 130i versus VW Golf R32
Watch videosWatch video
BMW 130i versus VW Golf R32
BMW 130i versus VW Golf R32
  • BMW 130i
BMW 130i versus VW Golf R32
BMW 130i versus VW Golf R32BMW 130i versus VW Golf R32

BMW 130i versus VW Golf R32BMW 130i versus VW Golf R32
Watch videosWatch video
BMW 130i versus VW Golf R32
BMW 130i versus VW Golf R32
  • VW Golf R32
BMW 130i versus VW Golf R32
BMW 130i versus VW Golf R32BMW 130i versus VW Golf R32

BMW 130i versus VW Golf R32BMW 130i versus VW Golf R32
Watch videosWatch video
BMW 130i versus VW Golf R32
BMW 130i versus VW Golf R32
  • R32 vs. 130i
BMW 130i versus VW Golf R32
BMW 130i versus VW Golf R32BMW 130i versus VW Golf R32
Over 250 hp, just over four meters and promise to go very fast. These characteristics are valid for two cars of our comparative, but the differences between them are so great that try to simplify their nature in one sentence seems a strategy to failure mission.And the mere configuration of each vehicle is different. The Golf uses 4Motion all-wheel drive, which is already known in the range, and in this version is true justification -in other models is recommended, the R32 is compulsorily. This element, in addition to the plus security conferred on asphalts in poor condition or under adverse weather conditions, will come in handy the most powerful Golf, because it "subject" to the ground when we decided to put all the meat on the grill and extract everything you can offer us this R32. As much as we tread the throttle, both straight and support, stability is not compromised and no loss of traction occur, which might seem logical given the enormous number of horses of this compact.He BMW 130i uses a different configuration and It opts for rear wheel drive, common in the Bavarian brand. With it, ensures the most exciting performance and quality unattainable guided in the category. However, there are many horses behind, which determines their behavior and makes it delicate in certain situations: wet asphalt or bad weather. For the moment, when the back-and insinuates sometimes more than that- and adrenaline shooting, you have to have good hands on the wheel. Definitely, 130i is the best choice for drivers who want sepan- -and bring out the full potential of the vehicle.Both models present us with firm, but not uncomfortable, and with accurate directions suspensions and snapshots, but in this section, we opted for the compact BMW, because the sensations offered are better: their suspensions are more effective and provide more comfort to the occupants and radiography wheel best asphalt and is faster in driving dynamics. Of course, when maneuvering the car is stationary or at low speed, we felt something hard.Both BMW and Volkswagen are cars that run a lot. Their engines they promise, but, as in the case of traction differs both mechanical configuration, The propeller 130i is a six-cylinder 265 hp officially delivered and a maximum torque of 32.7 mkg (269.1 hp and 33.3 mkg on our dynamometer); While, R32 is "satisfied" with "only" 250 hp and torque of 32.7 mkg (258 hp and 35 mkg, according to our measurements) and with a mechanical arrangement also comprising six cylinders, although in estes case V

brakes both are a guarantee of successboast a captivating sound

Averages around 11 liters per 100 km in the combined cycle, as measured by our Technical Center, seem to us a "price" worth paying