Opel Meriva 1.7 CDTi vs Ford C-Max 1.6 TDCi

They have grown both cars, many
They distort the sizes assimilated
different segments. These minivans,
we find how a “utilitarian” Opel Meriva
You can perform its functions as an apparent
Ford C-Max … with better performance and
saving money.

Opel Meriva 1.7 CDTi vs Ford C-Max 1.6 TDCi

Opel Meriva 1.7 CDTi vs Ford C-Max 1.6 TDCi

Opel Meriva 1.7 CDTi vs Ford C-Max 1.6 TDCi

Opel Meriva 1.7 CDTi vs Ford C-Max 1.6 TDCi

One of the best examples of possible aspirations that can lead to gain size we see in the new Opel Meriva, cheekily 24 centimeters longer than its predecessor. His final measures -4.29 m long, like a Renault Megane! – I approach both compact MPVs away as the utility. In the meantime, the new C-Max has grown only 1 cm (for a total of 4.38 m), exception argued by the joint of the new range with the variant Grand C-Max 7 seats. We then find a Meriva with an inner capacity not desmerecería against a compact MPV a generation and which may not necessarily be a demerit against habitability the new C-Max.

More significant may be those other issues such as equipment, performance and price. Against the 20,810 euro rate Meriva most powerful diesel (130 hp) and better equipped (Cosmo) range, Ford asks 20,950 euros for the basic finish (Trend) of 115 hp diesel version of the C-Max. Equating equipment as far as possible, the bill C-Max with superior finish Titanium up to 22,700 euros, and the difference widens further if current promotional discounts apply:  600 in the C-Max and 1300 Meriva. So, we find one Meriva 2,590 euros cheaper and a lot more performance engine.

For its size / power for many users Opel Meriva could be labeled as sports given their level of performance. It is not only much faster than Ford C-Max, but your answer is also more temperamental. Transmitted to the passenger compartment greater strength, greater acceleration capacity, against a C-Max … more progressive and refined. In this regard, CDTi engine of the Meriva, Opel and throughout, It has much room for improvement in filtration and acoustic vibration, appearance the C-Max solves generally quite good; Loudness is the aspect that mark qualitative differences between the Meriva and C-Max, above the presumable every car category.

Engine power Meriva 1.7 CDTI It is also reflected in their consumption, higher than in the C-Max, especially in cities, where, regardless of their larger displacement, resume walking from standstill to be a drag on the Biggest weight! Meriva. In its latest products, Opel does not appear to have applied the weight-saving strategy that almost all rivals touting their new models and both Meriva, Astra and Insignia as are true heavyweights on the scale; this Meriva has weighed us something more than half a ton.

Interestingly, this feature can bring you to Meriva some benefit. Its footprint is very solid road, car very well established in changes in support, speed bumps, etc. On the one hand, because this powerful version does not conceals high strength spring and damping, but also because its “overweight” is well distributed on a platform with a shoeprint -has the same battle the C-Max- and this translates into a touch big car rolling.

In this respect it is better car than any other type minivan Renault Grand Modus or Citroen C3 Picasso, but not to overshadow the new C-Max, surely the best compact minivan segment footprint. He “Small Meriva” we may be surprised by his rutero aplomb, but structural rigidity and damping quality C-Max transmit a rigorous tread and guiding senior car and specially tuned. Where there are so many differences is touch mechanical change, address, clutch or brake transmit both models, a real compliment for Meriva, which incidentally, he has shown us better braking skills, supported by front brake discs large.  

Are the width dimensions which mark the major differences between C-Max and Meriva. Mainly to take into account the second row if it is usually occupied by three passengers. Moreover, they are Very few centimeters that yields the Meriva against the C-Max in any direction, and in no case to feel the Opel as a negatively small car.

With the same battle, the view is that he Meriva gives its centimeters in the rear overhang and by extension in the trunk. But their 460 liters are excellent and perfectly comparable to the 500 C-Max. The always critical legroom for rear passengers manages very well Meriva, offering Serial sliding seat. Taking him back, reduces the trunk to 395 liters and lifts the leg in dimension to immense 75cm, better level than the C-Max. He Ford You may also resort to a modular stool, but if is optional. In both cases, the solution is similar and can sacrifice the central plaza and external focus. This way, you win perimeter space applied to the comfort and safety in a side impact with another car.

Driving both positions are well resolved. As in a sedan, the driver is well integrated into the passenger compartment higher in these cases, but not to feel desubicadamente raised. Steering wheel, gear lever, pedals … everything is natural. In the case of Meriva, the parking brake is operated by a comfortable key while the C-Max It maintains the traditional mechanical lever. Both the standard equipment as the most common option is contemplated in both models equally equating their different trim levels. Alone the C-Max offers two gadgets as parking assistance or electrically operated tailgate own upper segment to which it belongs. He Meriva, meanwhile, it provides a convenient integrated rack.

One of the best examples of possible aspirations that can lead to gain size we see in the new Opel Meriva, cheekily 24 centimeters longer than its predecessor. His final measures -4.29 m long, like a Renault Megane! – I approach both compact MPVs away as the utility. In the meantime, the new C-Max has grown only 1 cm (for a total of 4.38 m), exception argued by the joint of the new range with the variant Grand C-Max 7 seats. We then find a Meriva with an inner capacity not desmerecería against a compact MPV a generation and which may not necessarily be a demerit against habitability the new C-Max.

More significant may be those other issues such as equipment, performance and price. Against the 20,810 euro rate Meriva most powerful diesel (130 hp) and better equipped (Cosmo) range, Ford asks 20,950 euros for the basic finish (Trend) of 115 hp diesel version of the C-Max. Equating equipment as far as possible, the bill C-Max with superior finish Titanium up to 22,700 euros, and the difference widens further if current promotional discounts apply:  600 in the C-Max and 1300 Meriva. So, we find one Meriva 2,590 euros cheaper and a lot more performance engine.

For its size / power for many users Opel Meriva could be labeled as sports given their level of performance. It is not only much faster than Ford C-Max, but your answer is also more temperamental. Transmitted to the passenger compartment greater strength, greater acceleration capacity, against a C-Max … more progressive and refined. In this regard, CDTi engine of the Meriva, Opel and throughout, It has much room for improvement in filtration and acoustic vibration, appearance the C-Max solves generally quite good; Loudness is the aspect that mark qualitative differences between the Meriva and C-Max, above the presumable every car category.

Engine power Meriva 1.7 CDTI It is also reflected in their consumption, higher than in the C-Max, especially in cities, where, regardless of their larger displacement, resume walking from standstill to be a drag on the Biggest weight! Meriva. In its latest products, Opel does not appear to have applied the weight-saving strategy that almost all rivals touting their new models and both Meriva, Astra and Insignia as are true heavyweights on the scale; this Meriva has weighed us something more than half a ton.

Interestingly, this feature can bring you to Meriva some benefit. Its footprint is very solid road, car very well established in changes in support, speed bumps, etc. On the one hand, because this powerful version does not conceals high strength spring and damping, but also because its “overweight” is well distributed on a platform with a shoeprint -has the same battle the C-Max- and this translates into a touch big car rolling.

In this respect it is better car than any other type minivan Renault Grand Modus or Citroen C3 Picasso, but not to overshadow the new C-Max, surely the best compact minivan segment footprint. He “Small Meriva” we may be surprised by his rutero aplomb, but structural rigidity and damping quality C-Max transmit a rigorous tread and guiding senior car and specially tuned. Where there are so many differences is touch mechanical change, address, clutch or brake transmit both models, a real compliment for Meriva, which incidentally, he has shown us better braking skills, supported by front brake discs large.  

Are the width dimensions which mark the major differences between C-Max and Meriva. Mainly to take into account the second row if it is usually occupied by three passengers. Moreover, they are Very few centimeters that yields the Meriva against the C-Max in any direction, and in no case to feel the Opel as a negatively small car.

With the same battle, the view is that he Meriva gives its centimeters in the rear overhang and by extension in the trunk. But their 460 liters are excellent and perfectly comparable to the 500 C-Max. The always critical legroom for rear passengers manages very well Meriva, offering Serial sliding seat. Taking him back, reduces the trunk to 395 liters and lifts the leg in dimension to immense 75cm, better level than the C-Max. He Ford You may also resort to a modular stool, but if is optional. In both cases, the solution is similar and can sacrifice the central plaza and external focus. This way, you win perimeter space applied to the comfort and safety in a side impact with another car.

Driving both positions are well resolved. As in a sedan, the driver is well integrated into the passenger compartment higher in these cases, but not to feel desubicadamente raised. Steering wheel, gear lever, pedals … everything is natural. In the case of Meriva, the parking brake is operated by a comfortable key while the C-Max It maintains the traditional mechanical lever. Both the standard equipment as the most common option is contemplated in both models equally equating their different trim levels. Alone the C-Max offers two gadgets as parking assistance or electrically operated tailgate own upper segment to which it belongs. He Meriva, meanwhile, it provides a convenient integrated rack.